tree 0d91180f628c4bafd721d636e0b537575885fdff
parent 8f7e3de0970c419688f23f505b5cb7a9690d9b09
author Martin Ågren <martin.agren@gmail.com> 1601212543 +0200
committer Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> 1601241707 -0700

wt-status: introduce wt_status_state_free_buffers()

When we have a `struct wt_status_state`, we manually free its `branch`,
`onto` and `detached_from`, or sometimes just one or two of them.
Provide a function `wt_status_state_free_buffers()` which does the
freeing.

The callers are still aware of these fields, e.g., they check whether
`branch` was populated or not. But this way, they don't need to know
about *all* of them, and if `struct wt_status_state` gets more fields,
they will not need to learn to free them.

Users of `struct wt_status` (which contains a `wt_status_state`) already
have `wt_status_collect_free_buffers()` (corresponding to
`wt_status_collect()`) which we can also teach to use this new helper.

Finally, note that we're currently leaving dangling pointers behind.
Some callers work on a stack-allocated struct, where this is obviously
ok. But for the users of `run_status()` in builtin/commit.c, there are
ample opportunities for someone to mistakenly use those dangling
pointers. We seem to be ok for now, but it's a use-after-free waiting to
happen. Let's leave NULL-pointers behind instead.

Signed-off-by: Martin Ågren <martin.agren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>