packed-refs: use `fwrite()` when passing refs verbatim
The `write_with_updates()` function uses a `struct ref_iterator` to
iterate over all refs to write to the temporary packed-refs file. It
receives the iterator from `packed_ref_iterator_begin()` which takes a
snapshot of the 'packed-refs' file.
While writing to the new packed-refs file, writes are routed via
`write_packed_entry()` which uses `fprintf()`. Even for references which
haven't changed, we use the same mechanism. This is slow since we need
to do string parsing and formatting. Instead, let's track the position
of unchanged references in the snapshot iterator and directly write
verbatim via `fwrite()`.
With this, any sanitization which was happening as a side effect of
reformatting is now lost. But that was never the job of this section of
the code, since the main intention is to simply rewrite the remaining
refs post deletion of the selective few.
This removes the unnecessary formatting operation involved. We can see a
consistent ~20% performance improvement when deleting from packed
references.
Benchmark 1: update-ref: delete ref (refcount = 100000, revision = master)
Time (mean ± σ): 28.7 ms ± 1.7 ms [User: 22.5 ms, System: 5.9 ms]
Range (min … max): 26.7 ms … 33.3 ms 46 runs
Benchmark 2: update-ref: delete ref (refcount = 100000, revision = b4/kn-speedup-packed-refs)
Time (mean ± σ): 23.8 ms ± 1.2 ms [User: 17.5 ms, System: 6.0 ms]
Range (min … max): 22.1 ms … 27.7 ms 56 runs
Summary
update-ref: delete ref (refcount = 100000, revision = b4/kn-speedup-packed-refs) ran
1.21 ± 0.09 times faster than update-ref: delete ref (refcount = 100000, revision = master)
Signed-off-by: Karthik Nayak <karthik.188@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Git is a fast, scalable, distributed revision control system with an unusually rich command set that provides both high-level operations and full access to internals.
Git is an Open Source project covered by the GNU General Public License version 2 (some parts of it are under different licenses, compatible with the GPLv2). It was originally written by Linus Torvalds with help of a group of hackers around the net.
Please read the file INSTALL for installation instructions.
Many Git online resources are accessible from https://git-scm.com/ including full documentation and Git related tools.
See Documentation/gittutorial.adoc to get started, then see Documentation/giteveryday.adoc for a useful minimum set of commands, and Documentation/git-<commandname>.adoc for documentation of each command. If git has been correctly installed, then the tutorial can also be read with man gittutorial or git help tutorial, and the documentation of each command with man git-<commandname> or git help <commandname>.
CVS users may also want to read Documentation/gitcvs-migration.adoc (man gitcvs-migration or git help cvs-migration if git is installed).
The user discussion and development of Git take place on the Git mailing list -- everyone is welcome to post bug reports, feature requests, comments and patches to git@vger.kernel.org (read Documentation/SubmittingPatches for instructions on patch submission and Documentation/CodingGuidelines).
Those wishing to help with error message, usage and informational message string translations (localization l10) should see po/README.md (a po file is a Portable Object file that holds the translations).
To subscribe to the list, send an email to git+subscribe@vger.kernel.org (see https://subspace.kernel.org/subscribing.html for details). The mailing list archives are available at https://lore.kernel.org/git/, https://marc.info/?l=git and other archival sites.
Issues which are security relevant should be disclosed privately to the Git Security mailing list git-security@googlegroups.com.
The maintainer frequently sends the “What's cooking” reports that list the current status of various development topics to the mailing list. The discussion following them give a good reference for project status, development direction and remaining tasks.
The name “git” was given by Linus Torvalds when he wrote the very first version. He described the tool as “the stupid content tracker” and the name as (depending on your mood):