tree 6ba657cf3151b7a359406074231c2442feadc8d7
parent 7593f4c53c699699c6968a5fdd795d0fdf99a65d
author Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com> 1583532813 -0600
committer David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> 1584979314 +0100

btrfs: scrub: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array member

The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array
member[1][2], introduced in C99:

struct foo {
        int stuff;
        struct boo array[];
};

By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning in
case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which will
help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.

Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by this
change:

  "Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
   may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of
   zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero." [1]

This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.

[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
[3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")

Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>