|  | Git Protocol Capabilities | 
|  | ========================= | 
|  |  | 
|  | NOTE: this document describes capabilities for versions 0 and 1 of the pack | 
|  | protocol. For version 2, please refer to the link:protocol-v2.html[protocol-v2] | 
|  | doc. | 
|  |  | 
|  | Servers SHOULD support all capabilities defined in this document. | 
|  |  | 
|  | On the very first line of the initial server response of either | 
|  | receive-pack and upload-pack the first reference is followed by | 
|  | a NUL byte and then a list of space delimited server capabilities. | 
|  | These allow the server to declare what it can and cannot support | 
|  | to the client. | 
|  |  | 
|  | Client will then send a space separated list of capabilities it wants | 
|  | to be in effect. The client MUST NOT ask for capabilities the server | 
|  | did not say it supports. | 
|  |  | 
|  | Server MUST diagnose and abort if capabilities it does not understand | 
|  | was sent.  Server MUST NOT ignore capabilities that client requested | 
|  | and server advertised.  As a consequence of these rules, server MUST | 
|  | NOT advertise capabilities it does not understand. | 
|  |  | 
|  | The 'atomic', 'report-status', 'delete-refs', 'quiet', and 'push-cert' | 
|  | capabilities are sent and recognized by the receive-pack (push to server) | 
|  | process. | 
|  |  | 
|  | The 'ofs-delta' and 'side-band-64k' capabilities are sent and recognized | 
|  | by both upload-pack and receive-pack protocols.  The 'agent' capability | 
|  | may optionally be sent in both protocols. | 
|  |  | 
|  | All other capabilities are only recognized by the upload-pack (fetch | 
|  | from server) process. | 
|  |  | 
|  | multi_ack | 
|  | --------- | 
|  |  | 
|  | The 'multi_ack' capability allows the server to return "ACK obj-id | 
|  | continue" as soon as it finds a commit that it can use as a common | 
|  | base, between the client's wants and the client's have set. | 
|  |  | 
|  | By sending this early, the server can potentially head off the client | 
|  | from walking any further down that particular branch of the client's | 
|  | repository history.  The client may still need to walk down other | 
|  | branches, sending have lines for those, until the server has a | 
|  | complete cut across the DAG, or the client has said "done". | 
|  |  | 
|  | Without multi_ack, a client sends have lines in --date-order until | 
|  | the server has found a common base.  That means the client will send | 
|  | have lines that are already known by the server to be common, because | 
|  | they overlap in time with another branch that the server hasn't found | 
|  | a common base on yet. | 
|  |  | 
|  | For example suppose the client has commits in caps that the server | 
|  | doesn't and the server has commits in lower case that the client | 
|  | doesn't, as in the following diagram: | 
|  |  | 
|  | +---- u ---------------------- x | 
|  | /              +----- y | 
|  | /              / | 
|  | a -- b -- c -- d -- E -- F | 
|  | \ | 
|  | +--- Q -- R -- S | 
|  |  | 
|  | If the client wants x,y and starts out by saying have F,S, the server | 
|  | doesn't know what F,S is.  Eventually the client says "have d" and | 
|  | the server sends "ACK d continue" to let the client know to stop | 
|  | walking down that line (so don't send c-b-a), but it's not done yet, | 
|  | it needs a base for x. The client keeps going with S-R-Q, until a | 
|  | gets reached, at which point the server has a clear base and it all | 
|  | ends. | 
|  |  | 
|  | Without multi_ack the client would have sent that c-b-a chain anyway, | 
|  | interleaved with S-R-Q. | 
|  |  | 
|  | multi_ack_detailed | 
|  | ------------------ | 
|  | This is an extension of multi_ack that permits client to better | 
|  | understand the server's in-memory state. See pack-protocol.txt, | 
|  | section "Packfile Negotiation" for more information. | 
|  |  | 
|  | no-done | 
|  | ------- | 
|  | This capability should only be used with the smart HTTP protocol. If | 
|  | multi_ack_detailed and no-done are both present, then the sender is | 
|  | free to immediately send a pack following its first "ACK obj-id ready" | 
|  | message. | 
|  |  | 
|  | Without no-done in the smart HTTP protocol, the server session would | 
|  | end and the client has to make another trip to send "done" before | 
|  | the server can send the pack. no-done removes the last round and | 
|  | thus slightly reduces latency. | 
|  |  | 
|  | thin-pack | 
|  | --------- | 
|  |  | 
|  | A thin pack is one with deltas which reference base objects not | 
|  | contained within the pack (but are known to exist at the receiving | 
|  | end). This can reduce the network traffic significantly, but it | 
|  | requires the receiving end to know how to "thicken" these packs by | 
|  | adding the missing bases to the pack. | 
|  |  | 
|  | The upload-pack server advertises 'thin-pack' when it can generate | 
|  | and send a thin pack. A client requests the 'thin-pack' capability | 
|  | when it understands how to "thicken" it, notifying the server that | 
|  | it can receive such a pack. A client MUST NOT request the | 
|  | 'thin-pack' capability if it cannot turn a thin pack into a | 
|  | self-contained pack. | 
|  |  | 
|  | Receive-pack, on the other hand, is assumed by default to be able to | 
|  | handle thin packs, but can ask the client not to use the feature by | 
|  | advertising the 'no-thin' capability. A client MUST NOT send a thin | 
|  | pack if the server advertises the 'no-thin' capability. | 
|  |  | 
|  | The reasons for this asymmetry are historical. The receive-pack | 
|  | program did not exist until after the invention of thin packs, so | 
|  | historically the reference implementation of receive-pack always | 
|  | understood thin packs. Adding 'no-thin' later allowed receive-pack | 
|  | to disable the feature in a backwards-compatible manner. | 
|  |  | 
|  |  | 
|  | side-band, side-band-64k | 
|  | ------------------------ | 
|  |  | 
|  | This capability means that server can send, and client understand multiplexed | 
|  | progress reports and error info interleaved with the packfile itself. | 
|  |  | 
|  | These two options are mutually exclusive. A modern client always | 
|  | favors 'side-band-64k'. | 
|  |  | 
|  | Either mode indicates that the packfile data will be streamed broken | 
|  | up into packets of up to either 1000 bytes in the case of 'side_band', | 
|  | or 65520 bytes in the case of 'side_band_64k'. Each packet is made up | 
|  | of a leading 4-byte pkt-line length of how much data is in the packet, | 
|  | followed by a 1-byte stream code, followed by the actual data. | 
|  |  | 
|  | The stream code can be one of: | 
|  |  | 
|  | 1 - pack data | 
|  | 2 - progress messages | 
|  | 3 - fatal error message just before stream aborts | 
|  |  | 
|  | The "side-band-64k" capability came about as a way for newer clients | 
|  | that can handle much larger packets to request packets that are | 
|  | actually crammed nearly full, while maintaining backward compatibility | 
|  | for the older clients. | 
|  |  | 
|  | Further, with side-band and its up to 1000-byte messages, it's actually | 
|  | 999 bytes of payload and 1 byte for the stream code. With side-band-64k, | 
|  | same deal, you have up to 65519 bytes of data and 1 byte for the stream | 
|  | code. | 
|  |  | 
|  | The client MUST send only maximum of one of "side-band" and "side- | 
|  | band-64k".  Server MUST diagnose it as an error if client requests | 
|  | both. | 
|  |  | 
|  | ofs-delta | 
|  | --------- | 
|  |  | 
|  | Server can send, and client understand PACKv2 with delta referring to | 
|  | its base by position in pack rather than by an obj-id.  That is, they can | 
|  | send/read OBJ_OFS_DELTA (aka type 6) in a packfile. | 
|  |  | 
|  | agent | 
|  | ----- | 
|  |  | 
|  | The server may optionally send a capability of the form `agent=X` to | 
|  | notify the client that the server is running version `X`. The client may | 
|  | optionally return its own agent string by responding with an `agent=Y` | 
|  | capability (but it MUST NOT do so if the server did not mention the | 
|  | agent capability). The `X` and `Y` strings may contain any printable | 
|  | ASCII characters except space (i.e., the byte range 32 < x < 127), and | 
|  | are typically of the form "package/version" (e.g., "git/1.8.3.1"). The | 
|  | agent strings are purely informative for statistics and debugging | 
|  | purposes, and MUST NOT be used to programmatically assume the presence | 
|  | or absence of particular features. | 
|  |  | 
|  | symref | 
|  | ------ | 
|  |  | 
|  | This parameterized capability is used to inform the receiver which symbolic ref | 
|  | points to which ref; for example, "symref=HEAD:refs/heads/master" tells the | 
|  | receiver that HEAD points to master. This capability can be repeated to | 
|  | represent multiple symrefs. | 
|  |  | 
|  | Servers SHOULD include this capability for the HEAD symref if it is one of the | 
|  | refs being sent. | 
|  |  | 
|  | Clients MAY use the parameters from this capability to select the proper initial | 
|  | branch when cloning a repository. | 
|  |  | 
|  | shallow | 
|  | ------- | 
|  |  | 
|  | This capability adds "deepen", "shallow" and "unshallow" commands to | 
|  | the  fetch-pack/upload-pack protocol so clients can request shallow | 
|  | clones. | 
|  |  | 
|  | deepen-since | 
|  | ------------ | 
|  |  | 
|  | This capability adds "deepen-since" command to fetch-pack/upload-pack | 
|  | protocol so the client can request shallow clones that are cut at a | 
|  | specific time, instead of depth. Internally it's equivalent of doing | 
|  | "rev-list --max-age=<timestamp>" on the server side. "deepen-since" | 
|  | cannot be used with "deepen". | 
|  |  | 
|  | deepen-not | 
|  | ---------- | 
|  |  | 
|  | This capability adds "deepen-not" command to fetch-pack/upload-pack | 
|  | protocol so the client can request shallow clones that are cut at a | 
|  | specific revision, instead of depth. Internally it's equivalent of | 
|  | doing "rev-list --not <rev>" on the server side. "deepen-not" | 
|  | cannot be used with "deepen", but can be used with "deepen-since". | 
|  |  | 
|  | deepen-relative | 
|  | --------------- | 
|  |  | 
|  | If this capability is requested by the client, the semantics of | 
|  | "deepen" command is changed. The "depth" argument is the depth from | 
|  | the current shallow boundary, instead of the depth from remote refs. | 
|  |  | 
|  | no-progress | 
|  | ----------- | 
|  |  | 
|  | The client was started with "git clone -q" or something, and doesn't | 
|  | want that side band 2.  Basically the client just says "I do not | 
|  | wish to receive stream 2 on sideband, so do not send it to me, and if | 
|  | you did, I will drop it on the floor anyway".  However, the sideband | 
|  | channel 3 is still used for error responses. | 
|  |  | 
|  | include-tag | 
|  | ----------- | 
|  |  | 
|  | The 'include-tag' capability is about sending annotated tags if we are | 
|  | sending objects they point to.  If we pack an object to the client, and | 
|  | a tag object points exactly at that object, we pack the tag object too. | 
|  | In general this allows a client to get all new annotated tags when it | 
|  | fetches a branch, in a single network connection. | 
|  |  | 
|  | Clients MAY always send include-tag, hardcoding it into a request when | 
|  | the server advertises this capability. The decision for a client to | 
|  | request include-tag only has to do with the client's desires for tag | 
|  | data, whether or not a server had advertised objects in the | 
|  | refs/tags/* namespace. | 
|  |  | 
|  | Servers MUST pack the tags if their referrant is packed and the client | 
|  | has requested include-tags. | 
|  |  | 
|  | Clients MUST be prepared for the case where a server has ignored | 
|  | include-tag and has not actually sent tags in the pack.  In such | 
|  | cases the client SHOULD issue a subsequent fetch to acquire the tags | 
|  | that include-tag would have otherwise given the client. | 
|  |  | 
|  | The server SHOULD send include-tag, if it supports it, regardless | 
|  | of whether or not there are tags available. | 
|  |  | 
|  | report-status | 
|  | ------------- | 
|  |  | 
|  | The receive-pack process can receive a 'report-status' capability, | 
|  | which tells it that the client wants a report of what happened after | 
|  | a packfile upload and reference update.  If the pushing client requests | 
|  | this capability, after unpacking and updating references the server | 
|  | will respond with whether the packfile unpacked successfully and if | 
|  | each reference was updated successfully.  If any of those were not | 
|  | successful, it will send back an error message.  See pack-protocol.txt | 
|  | for example messages. | 
|  |  | 
|  | delete-refs | 
|  | ----------- | 
|  |  | 
|  | If the server sends back the 'delete-refs' capability, it means that | 
|  | it is capable of accepting a zero-id value as the target | 
|  | value of a reference update.  It is not sent back by the client, it | 
|  | simply informs the client that it can be sent zero-id values | 
|  | to delete references. | 
|  |  | 
|  | quiet | 
|  | ----- | 
|  |  | 
|  | If the receive-pack server advertises the 'quiet' capability, it is | 
|  | capable of silencing human-readable progress output which otherwise may | 
|  | be shown when processing the received pack. A send-pack client should | 
|  | respond with the 'quiet' capability to suppress server-side progress | 
|  | reporting if the local progress reporting is also being suppressed | 
|  | (e.g., via `push -q`, or if stderr does not go to a tty). | 
|  |  | 
|  | atomic | 
|  | ------ | 
|  |  | 
|  | If the server sends the 'atomic' capability it is capable of accepting | 
|  | atomic pushes. If the pushing client requests this capability, the server | 
|  | will update the refs in one atomic transaction. Either all refs are | 
|  | updated or none. | 
|  |  | 
|  | push-options | 
|  | ------------ | 
|  |  | 
|  | If the server sends the 'push-options' capability it is able to accept | 
|  | push options after the update commands have been sent, but before the | 
|  | packfile is streamed. If the pushing client requests this capability, | 
|  | the server will pass the options to the pre- and post- receive hooks | 
|  | that process this push request. | 
|  |  | 
|  | allow-tip-sha1-in-want | 
|  | ---------------------- | 
|  |  | 
|  | If the upload-pack server advertises this capability, fetch-pack may | 
|  | send "want" lines with SHA-1s that exist at the server but are not | 
|  | advertised by upload-pack. | 
|  |  | 
|  | allow-reachable-sha1-in-want | 
|  | ---------------------------- | 
|  |  | 
|  | If the upload-pack server advertises this capability, fetch-pack may | 
|  | send "want" lines with SHA-1s that exist at the server but are not | 
|  | advertised by upload-pack. | 
|  |  | 
|  | push-cert=<nonce> | 
|  | ----------------- | 
|  |  | 
|  | The receive-pack server that advertises this capability is willing | 
|  | to accept a signed push certificate, and asks the <nonce> to be | 
|  | included in the push certificate.  A send-pack client MUST NOT | 
|  | send a push-cert packet unless the receive-pack server advertises | 
|  | this capability. | 
|  |  | 
|  | filter | 
|  | ------ | 
|  |  | 
|  | If the upload-pack server advertises the 'filter' capability, | 
|  | fetch-pack may send "filter" commands to request a partial clone | 
|  | or partial fetch and request that the server omit various objects | 
|  | from the packfile. |