| Partial Clone Design Notes | |
| ========================== | |
| The "Partial Clone" feature is a performance optimization for Git that | |
| allows Git to function without having a complete copy of the repository. | |
| The goal of this work is to allow Git better handle extremely large | |
| repositories. | |
| During clone and fetch operations, Git downloads the complete contents | |
| and history of the repository. This includes all commits, trees, and | |
| blobs for the complete life of the repository. For extremely large | |
| repositories, clones can take hours (or days) and consume 100+GiB of disk | |
| space. | |
| Often in these repositories there are many blobs and trees that the user | |
| does not need such as: | |
| 1. files outside of the user's work area in the tree. For example, in | |
| a repository with 500K directories and 3.5M files in every commit, | |
| we can avoid downloading many objects if the user only needs a | |
| narrow "cone" of the source tree. | |
| 2. large binary assets. For example, in a repository where large build | |
| artifacts are checked into the tree, we can avoid downloading all | |
| previous versions of these non-mergeable binary assets and only | |
| download versions that are actually referenced. | |
| Partial clone allows us to avoid downloading such unneeded objects *in | |
| advance* during clone and fetch operations and thereby reduce download | |
| times and disk usage. Missing objects can later be "demand fetched" | |
| if/when needed. | |
| Use of partial clone requires that the user be online and the origin | |
| remote be available for on-demand fetching of missing objects. This may | |
| or may not be problematic for the user. For example, if the user can | |
| stay within the pre-selected subset of the source tree, they may not | |
| encounter any missing objects. Alternatively, the user could try to | |
| pre-fetch various objects if they know that they are going offline. | |
| Non-Goals | |
| --------- | |
| Partial clone is a mechanism to limit the number of blobs and trees downloaded | |
| *within* a given range of commits -- and is therefore independent of and not | |
| intended to conflict with existing DAG-level mechanisms to limit the set of | |
| requested commits (i.e. shallow clone, single branch, or fetch '<refspec>'). | |
| Design Overview | |
| --------------- | |
| Partial clone logically consists of the following parts: | |
| - A mechanism for the client to describe unneeded or unwanted objects to | |
| the server. | |
| - A mechanism for the server to omit such unwanted objects from packfiles | |
| sent to the client. | |
| - A mechanism for the client to gracefully handle missing objects (that | |
| were previously omitted by the server). | |
| - A mechanism for the client to backfill missing objects as needed. | |
| Design Details | |
| -------------- | |
| - A new pack-protocol capability "filter" is added to the fetch-pack and | |
| upload-pack negotiation. | |
| + | |
| This uses the existing capability discovery mechanism. | |
| See "filter" in Documentation/technical/pack-protocol.txt. | |
| - Clients pass a "filter-spec" to clone and fetch which is passed to the | |
| server to request filtering during packfile construction. | |
| + | |
| There are various filters available to accommodate different situations. | |
| See "--filter=<filter-spec>" in Documentation/rev-list-options.txt. | |
| - On the server pack-objects applies the requested filter-spec as it | |
| creates "filtered" packfiles for the client. | |
| + | |
| These filtered packfiles are *incomplete* in the traditional sense because | |
| they may contain objects that reference objects not contained in the | |
| packfile and that the client doesn't already have. For example, the | |
| filtered packfile may contain trees or tags that reference missing blobs | |
| or commits that reference missing trees. | |
| - On the client these incomplete packfiles are marked as "promisor packfiles" | |
| and treated differently by various commands. | |
| - On the client a repository extension is added to the local config to | |
| prevent older versions of git from failing mid-operation because of | |
| missing objects that they cannot handle. | |
| See "extensions.partialClone" in Documentation/technical/repository-version.txt" | |
| Handling Missing Objects | |
| ------------------------ | |
| - An object may be missing due to a partial clone or fetch, or missing due | |
| to repository corruption. To differentiate these cases, the local | |
| repository specially indicates such filtered packfiles obtained from the | |
| promisor remote as "promisor packfiles". | |
| + | |
| These promisor packfiles consist of a "<name>.promisor" file with | |
| arbitrary contents (like the "<name>.keep" files), in addition to | |
| their "<name>.pack" and "<name>.idx" files. | |
| - The local repository considers a "promisor object" to be an object that | |
| it knows (to the best of its ability) that the promisor remote has promised | |
| that it has, either because the local repository has that object in one of | |
| its promisor packfiles, or because another promisor object refers to it. | |
| + | |
| When Git encounters a missing object, Git can see if it is a promisor object | |
| and handle it appropriately. If not, Git can report a corruption. | |
| + | |
| This means that there is no need for the client to explicitly maintain an | |
| expensive-to-modify list of missing objects.[a] | |
| - Since almost all Git code currently expects any referenced object to be | |
| present locally and because we do not want to force every command to do | |
| a dry-run first, a fallback mechanism is added to allow Git to attempt | |
| to dynamically fetch missing objects from the promisor remote. | |
| + | |
| When the normal object lookup fails to find an object, Git invokes | |
| fetch-object to try to get the object from the server and then retry | |
| the object lookup. This allows objects to be "faulted in" without | |
| complicated prediction algorithms. | |
| + | |
| For efficiency reasons, no check as to whether the missing object is | |
| actually a promisor object is performed. | |
| + | |
| Dynamic object fetching tends to be slow as objects are fetched one at | |
| a time. | |
| - `checkout` (and any other command using `unpack-trees`) has been taught | |
| to bulk pre-fetch all required missing blobs in a single batch. | |
| - `rev-list` has been taught to print missing objects. | |
| + | |
| This can be used by other commands to bulk prefetch objects. | |
| For example, a "git log -p A..B" may internally want to first do | |
| something like "git rev-list --objects --quiet --missing=print A..B" | |
| and prefetch those objects in bulk. | |
| - `fsck` has been updated to be fully aware of promisor objects. | |
| - `repack` in GC has been updated to not touch promisor packfiles at all, | |
| and to only repack other objects. | |
| - The global variable "fetch_if_missing" is used to control whether an | |
| object lookup will attempt to dynamically fetch a missing object or | |
| report an error. | |
| + | |
| We are not happy with this global variable and would like to remove it, | |
| but that requires significant refactoring of the object code to pass an | |
| additional flag. We hope that concurrent efforts to add an ODB API can | |
| encompass this. | |
| Fetching Missing Objects | |
| ------------------------ | |
| - Fetching of objects is done using the existing transport mechanism using | |
| transport_fetch_refs(), setting a new transport option | |
| TRANS_OPT_NO_DEPENDENTS to indicate that only the objects themselves are | |
| desired, not any object that they refer to. | |
| + | |
| Because some transports invoke fetch_pack() in the same process, fetch_pack() | |
| has been updated to not use any object flags when the corresponding argument | |
| (no_dependents) is set. | |
| - The local repository sends a request with the hashes of all requested | |
| objects as "want" lines, and does not perform any packfile negotiation. | |
| It then receives a packfile. | |
| - Because we are reusing the existing fetch-pack mechanism, fetching | |
| currently fetches all objects referred to by the requested objects, even | |
| though they are not necessary. | |
| Current Limitations | |
| ------------------- | |
| - The remote used for a partial clone (or the first partial fetch | |
| following a regular clone) is marked as the "promisor remote". | |
| + | |
| We are currently limited to a single promisor remote and only that | |
| remote may be used for subsequent partial fetches. | |
| + | |
| We accept this limitation because we believe initial users of this | |
| feature will be using it on repositories with a strong single central | |
| server. | |
| - Dynamic object fetching will only ask the promisor remote for missing | |
| objects. We assume that the promisor remote has a complete view of the | |
| repository and can satisfy all such requests. | |
| - Repack essentially treats promisor and non-promisor packfiles as 2 | |
| distinct partitions and does not mix them. Repack currently only works | |
| on non-promisor packfiles and loose objects. | |
| - Dynamic object fetching invokes fetch-pack once *for each item* | |
| because most algorithms stumble upon a missing object and need to have | |
| it resolved before continuing their work. This may incur significant | |
| overhead -- and multiple authentication requests -- if many objects are | |
| needed. | |
| - Dynamic object fetching currently uses the existing pack protocol V0 | |
| which means that each object is requested via fetch-pack. The server | |
| will send a full set of info/refs when the connection is established. | |
| If there are large number of refs, this may incur significant overhead. | |
| Future Work | |
| ----------- | |
| - Allow more than one promisor remote and define a strategy for fetching | |
| missing objects from specific promisor remotes or of iterating over the | |
| set of promisor remotes until a missing object is found. | |
| + | |
| A user might want to have multiple geographically-close cache servers | |
| for fetching missing blobs while continuing to do filtered `git-fetch` | |
| commands from the central server, for example. | |
| + | |
| Or the user might want to work in a triangular work flow with multiple | |
| promisor remotes that each have an incomplete view of the repository. | |
| - Allow repack to work on promisor packfiles (while keeping them distinct | |
| from non-promisor packfiles). | |
| - Allow non-pathname-based filters to make use of packfile bitmaps (when | |
| present). This was just an omission during the initial implementation. | |
| - Investigate use of a long-running process to dynamically fetch a series | |
| of objects, such as proposed in [5,6] to reduce process startup and | |
| overhead costs. | |
| + | |
| It would be nice if pack protocol V2 could allow that long-running | |
| process to make a series of requests over a single long-running | |
| connection. | |
| - Investigate pack protocol V2 to avoid the info/refs broadcast on | |
| each connection with the server to dynamically fetch missing objects. | |
| - Investigate the need to handle loose promisor objects. | |
| + | |
| Objects in promisor packfiles are allowed to reference missing objects | |
| that can be dynamically fetched from the server. An assumption was | |
| made that loose objects are only created locally and therefore should | |
| not reference a missing object. We may need to revisit that assumption | |
| if, for example, we dynamically fetch a missing tree and store it as a | |
| loose object rather than a single object packfile. | |
| + | |
| This does not necessarily mean we need to mark loose objects as promisor; | |
| it may be sufficient to relax the object lookup or is-promisor functions. | |
| Non-Tasks | |
| --------- | |
| - Every time the subject of "demand loading blobs" comes up it seems | |
| that someone suggests that the server be allowed to "guess" and send | |
| additional objects that may be related to the requested objects. | |
| + | |
| No work has gone into actually doing that; we're just documenting that | |
| it is a common suggestion. We're not sure how it would work and have | |
| no plans to work on it. | |
| + | |
| It is valid for the server to send more objects than requested (even | |
| for a dynamic object fetch), but we are not building on that. | |
| Footnotes | |
| --------- | |
| [a] expensive-to-modify list of missing objects: Earlier in the design of | |
| partial clone we discussed the need for a single list of missing objects. | |
| This would essentially be a sorted linear list of OIDs that the were | |
| omitted by the server during a clone or subsequent fetches. | |
| This file would need to be loaded into memory on every object lookup. | |
| It would need to be read, updated, and re-written (like the .git/index) | |
| on every explicit "git fetch" command *and* on any dynamic object fetch. | |
| The cost to read, update, and write this file could add significant | |
| overhead to every command if there are many missing objects. For example, | |
| if there are 100M missing blobs, this file would be at least 2GiB on disk. | |
| With the "promisor" concept, we *infer* a missing object based upon the | |
| type of packfile that references it. | |
| Related Links | |
| ------------- | |
| [0] https://crbug.com/git/2 | |
| Bug#2: Partial Clone | |
| [1] https://public-inbox.org/git/20170113155253.1644-1-benpeart@microsoft.com/ + | |
| Subject: [RFC] Add support for downloading blobs on demand + | |
| Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2017 10:52:53 -0500 | |
| [2] https://public-inbox.org/git/cover.1506714999.git.jonathantanmy@google.com/ + | |
| Subject: [PATCH 00/18] Partial clone (from clone to lazy fetch in 18 patches) + | |
| Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2017 13:11:36 -0700 | |
| [3] https://public-inbox.org/git/20170426221346.25337-1-jonathantanmy@google.com/ + | |
| Subject: Proposal for missing blob support in Git repos + | |
| Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2017 15:13:46 -0700 | |
| [4] https://public-inbox.org/git/1488999039-37631-1-git-send-email-git@jeffhostetler.com/ + | |
| Subject: [PATCH 00/10] RFC Partial Clone and Fetch + | |
| Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2017 18:50:29 +0000 | |
| [5] https://public-inbox.org/git/20170505152802.6724-1-benpeart@microsoft.com/ + | |
| Subject: [PATCH v7 00/10] refactor the filter process code into a reusable module + | |
| Date: Fri, 5 May 2017 11:27:52 -0400 | |
| [6] https://public-inbox.org/git/20170714132651.170708-1-benpeart@microsoft.com/ + | |
| Subject: [RFC/PATCH v2 0/1] Add support for downloading blobs on demand + | |
| Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2017 09:26:50 -0400 |