show-branch: fix performance problem.

The core function used in show-branch, join_revs(), was supposed
to be exactly the same algorithm as merge_bases(), except that
it was a version enhanced for use with more than two heads.
However, it needed to mark and keep a list of all the commits it
has seen, because it needed them for its semi-graphical output.
The function to implement this list, mark_seen(), stupidly used
insert_by_date(), when it did not need to keep the list sorted
during its processing.  This made "show-branch --merge-base"
more than 20x slower compared to "merge-base --all" in some
cases (e.g. between b5032a5 and 48ce8b0 in the Linux 2.6 kernel
archive).  The performance of "show-branch --independent"
suffered from the same reason.

This patch sorts the resulting list after the list traversal
just once to fix these problems.

Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
diff --git a/builtin-show-branch.c b/builtin-show-branch.c
index 260cb22..3d240ca 100644
--- a/builtin-show-branch.c
+++ b/builtin-show-branch.c
@@ -172,7 +172,7 @@
 static int mark_seen(struct commit *commit, struct commit_list **seen_p)
 {
 	if (!commit->object.flags) {
-		insert_by_date(commit, seen_p);
+		commit_list_insert(commit, seen_p);
 		return 1;
 	}
 	return 0;
@@ -218,9 +218,8 @@
 	 * Postprocess to complete well-poisoning.
 	 *
 	 * At this point we have all the commits we have seen in
-	 * seen_p list (which happens to be sorted chronologically but
-	 * it does not really matter).  Mark anything that can be
-	 * reached from uninteresting commits not interesting.
+	 * seen_p list.  Mark anything that can be reached from
+	 * uninteresting commits not interesting.
 	 */
 	for (;;) {
 		int changed = 0;
@@ -701,6 +700,8 @@
 	if (0 <= extra)
 		join_revs(&list, &seen, num_rev, extra);
 
+	sort_by_date(&seen);
+
 	if (merge_base)
 		return show_merge_base(seen, num_rev);