| From: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> | 
 | Subject: Separating topic branches | 
 | Abstract: In this article, JC describes how to separate topic branches. | 
 |  | 
 | This text was originally a footnote to a discussion about the | 
 | behaviour of the git diff commands. | 
 |  | 
 | Often I find myself doing that [running diff against something other | 
 | than HEAD] while rewriting messy development history.  For example, I | 
 | start doing some work without knowing exactly where it leads, and end | 
 | up with a history like this: | 
 |  | 
 |             "master" | 
 |         o---o | 
 |              \                    "topic" | 
 |               o---o---o---o---o---o | 
 |  | 
 | At this point, "topic" contains something I know I want, but it | 
 | contains two concepts that turned out to be completely independent. | 
 | And often, one topic component is larger than the other.  It may | 
 | contain more than two topics. | 
 |  | 
 | In order to rewrite this mess to be more manageable, I would first do | 
 | "diff master..topic", to extract the changes into a single patch, start | 
 | picking pieces from it to get logically self-contained units, and | 
 | start building on top of "master": | 
 |  | 
 |         $ git diff master..topic >P.diff | 
 |         $ git checkout -b topicA master | 
 |         ... pick and apply pieces from P.diff to build | 
 |         ... commits on topicA branch. | 
 |  | 
 |               o---o---o | 
 |              /        "topicA" | 
 |         o---o"master" | 
 |              \                    "topic" | 
 |               o---o---o---o---o---o | 
 |  | 
 | Before doing each commit on "topicA" HEAD, I run "diff HEAD" | 
 | before update-index the affected paths, or "diff --cached HEAD" | 
 | after.  Also I would run "diff --cached master" to make sure | 
 | that the changes are only the ones related to "topicA".  Usually | 
 | I do this for smaller topics first. | 
 |  | 
 | After that, I'd do the remainder of the original "topic", but | 
 | for that, I do not start from the patchfile I extracted by | 
 | comparing "master" and "topic" I used initially.  Still on | 
 | "topicA", I extract "diff topic", and use it to rebuild the | 
 | other topic: | 
 |  | 
 |         $ git diff -R topic >P.diff ;# --cached also would work fine | 
 |         $ git checkout -b topicB master | 
 |         ... pick and apply pieces from P.diff to build | 
 |         ... commits on topicB branch. | 
 |  | 
 |                                 "topicB" | 
 |                o---o---o---o---o | 
 |               / | 
 |              /o---o---o | 
 |             |/        "topicA" | 
 |         o---o"master" | 
 |              \                    "topic" | 
 |               o---o---o---o---o---o | 
 |  | 
 | After I am done, I'd try a pretend-merge between "topicA" and | 
 | "topicB" in order to make sure I have not missed anything: | 
 |  | 
 |         $ git pull . topicA ;# merge it into current "topicB" | 
 |         $ git diff topic | 
 |                                 "topicB" | 
 |                o---o---o---o---o---* (pretend merge) | 
 |               /                   / | 
 |              /o---o---o----------' | 
 |             |/        "topicA" | 
 |         o---o"master" | 
 |              \                    "topic" | 
 |               o---o---o---o---o---o | 
 |  | 
 | The last diff better not to show anything other than cleanups | 
 | for crufts.  Then I can finally clean things up: | 
 |  | 
 |         $ git branch -D topic | 
 |         $ git reset --hard HEAD^ ;# nuke pretend merge | 
 |  | 
 |                                 "topicB" | 
 |                o---o---o---o---o | 
 |               / | 
 |              /o---o---o | 
 |             |/        "topicA" | 
 |         o---o"master" |