contrib/subtree/git-subtree.txt

git-subtree(1)
==============

NAME
----
git-subtree - Merge subtrees together and split repository into subtrees


SYNOPSIS
--------
[verse]
'git subtree' [<options>] -P <prefix> add <local-commit>
'git subtree' [<options>] -P <prefix> add <repository> <remote-ref>
'git subtree' [<options>] -P <prefix> merge <local-commit> [<repository>]
'git subtree' [<options>] -P <prefix> split [<local-commit>]

[verse]
'git subtree' [<options>] -P <prefix> pull <repository> <remote-ref>
'git subtree' [<options>] -P <prefix> push <repository> <refspec>

DESCRIPTION
-----------
Subtrees allow subprojects to be included within a subdirectory
of the main project, optionally including the subproject's
entire history.

For example, you could include the source code for a library
as a subdirectory of your application.

Subtrees are not to be confused with submodules, which are meant for
the same task. Unlike submodules, subtrees do not need any special
constructions (like '.gitmodules' files or gitlinks) be present in
your repository, and do not force end-users of your
repository to do anything special or to understand how subtrees
work. A subtree is just a subdirectory that can be
committed to, branched, and merged along with your project in
any way you want.

They are also not to be confused with using the subtree merge
strategy. The main difference is that, besides merging
the other project as a subdirectory, you can also extract the
entire history of a subdirectory from your project and make it
into a standalone project. Unlike the subtree merge strategy
you can alternate back and forth between these
two operations. If the standalone library gets updated, you can
automatically merge the changes into your project; if you
update the library inside your project, you can "split" the
changes back out again and merge them back into the library
project.

For example, if a library you made for one application ends up being
useful elsewhere, you can extract its entire history and publish
that as its own git repository, without accidentally
intermingling the history of your application project.

[TIP]
In order to keep your commit messages clean, we recommend that
people split their commits between the subtrees and the main
project as much as possible.  That is, if you make a change that
affects both the library and the main application, commit it in
two pieces.  That way, when you split the library commits out
later, their descriptions will still make sense.  But if this
isn't important to you, it's not *necessary*.  'git subtree' will
simply leave out the non-library-related parts of the commit
when it splits it out into the subproject later.


COMMANDS
--------
add <local-commit>::
add <repository> <remote-ref>::
	Create the <prefix> subtree by importing its contents
	from the given <local-commit> or <repository> and <remote-ref>.
	A new commit is created	automatically, joining the imported
	project's history with your own.  With '--squash', import
	only a single commit from the subproject, rather than its
	entire history.

merge <local-commit> [<repository>]::
	Merge recent changes up to <local-commit> into the <prefix>
	subtree.  As with normal 'git merge', this doesn't
	remove your own local changes; it just merges those
	changes into the latest <local-commit>.  With '--squash',
	create only one commit that contains all the changes,
	rather than merging in the entire history.
+
If you use '--squash', the merge direction doesn't always have to be
forward; you can use this command to go back in time from v2.5 to v2.4,
for example.  If your merge introduces a conflict, you can resolve it in
the usual ways.
+
When using '--squash', and the previous merge with '--squash' merged an
annotated tag of the subtree repository, that tag needs to be available locally.
If <repository> is given, a missing tag will automatically be fetched from that
repository.

split [<local-commit>] [<repository>]::
	Extract a new, synthetic project history from the
	history of the <prefix> subtree of <local-commit>, or of
	HEAD if no <local-commit> is given.  The new history
	includes only the commits (including merges) that
	affected <prefix>, and each of those commits now has the
	contents of <prefix> at the root of the project instead
	of in a subdirectory.  Thus, the newly created history
	is suitable for export as a separate git repository.
+
After splitting successfully, a single commit ID is printed to stdout.
This corresponds to the HEAD of the newly created tree, which you can
manipulate however you want.
+
Repeated splits of exactly the same history are guaranteed to be
identical (i.e. to produce the same commit IDs) as long as the
settings passed to 'split' (such as '--annotate') are the same.
Because of this, if you add new commits and then re-split, the new
commits will be attached as commits on top of the history you
generated last time, so 'git merge' and friends will work as expected.
+
When a previous merge with '--squash' merged an annotated tag of the
subtree repository, that tag needs to be available locally.
If <repository> is given, a missing tag will automatically be fetched from that
repository.

pull <repository> <remote-ref>::
	Exactly like 'merge', but parallels 'git pull' in that
	it fetches the given ref from the specified remote
	repository.

push <repository> [+][<local-commit>:]<remote-ref>::
	Does a 'split' using the <prefix> subtree of <local-commit>
	and then does a 'git push' to push the result to the
	<repository> and <remote-ref>.  This can be used to push your
	subtree to different branches of the remote repository.  Just
	as with 'split', if no <local-commit> is given, then HEAD is
	used.  The optional leading '+' is ignored.

OPTIONS FOR ALL COMMANDS
------------------------
-q::
--quiet::
	Suppress unnecessary output messages on stderr.

-d::
--debug::
	Produce even more unnecessary output messages on stderr.

-P <prefix>::
--prefix=<prefix>::
	Specify the path in the repository to the subtree you
	want to manipulate.  This option is mandatory
	for all commands.

OPTIONS FOR 'add' AND 'merge' (ALSO: 'pull', 'split --rejoin', AND 'push --rejoin')
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
These options for 'add' and 'merge' may also be given to 'pull' (which
wraps 'merge'), 'split --rejoin' (which wraps either 'add' or 'merge'
as appropriate), and 'push --rejoin' (which wraps 'split --rejoin').

--squash::
	Instead of merging the entire history from the subtree project, produce
	only a single commit that contains all the differences you want to
	merge, and then merge that new commit into your project.
+
Using this option helps to reduce log clutter. People rarely want to see
every change that happened between v1.0 and v1.1 of the library they're
using, since none of the interim versions were ever included in their
application.
+
Using '--squash' also helps avoid problems when the same subproject is
included multiple times in the same project, or is removed and then
re-added.  In such a case, it doesn't make sense to combine the
histories anyway, since it's unclear which part of the history belongs
to which subtree.
+
Furthermore, with '--squash', you can switch back and forth between
different versions of a subtree, rather than strictly forward.  'git
subtree merge --squash' always adjusts the subtree to match the exactly
specified commit, even if getting to that commit would require undoing
some changes that were added earlier.
+
Whether or not you use '--squash', changes made in your local repository
remain intact and can be later split and send upstream to the
subproject.

-m <message>::
--message=<message>::
	Specify <message> as the commit message for the merge commit.

OPTIONS FOR 'split' (ALSO: 'push')
----------------------------------
These options for 'split' may also be given to 'push' (which wraps
'split').

--annotate=<annotation>::
	When generating synthetic history, add <annotation> as a prefix to each
	commit message.  Since we're creating new commits with the same commit
	message, but possibly different content, from the original commits, this
	can help to differentiate them and avoid confusion.
+
Whenever you split, you need to use the same <annotation>, or else you
don't have a guarantee that the new re-created history will be identical
to the old one.  That will prevent merging from working correctly.  git
subtree tries to make it work anyway, particularly if you use '--rejoin',
but it may not always be effective.

-b <branch>::
--branch=<branch>::
	After generating the synthetic history, create a new branch called
	<branch> that contains the new history.  This is suitable for immediate
	pushing upstream.  <branch> must not already exist.

--ignore-joins::
	If you use '--rejoin', git subtree attempts to optimize its history
	reconstruction to generate only the new commits since the last
	'--rejoin'.  '--ignore-joins' disables this behavior, forcing it to
	regenerate the entire history.  In a large project, this can take a long
	time.

--onto=<onto>::
	If your subtree was originally imported using something other than git
	subtree, its history may not match what git subtree is expecting.  In
	that case, you can specify the commit ID <onto> that corresponds to the
	first revision of the subproject's history that was imported into your
	project, and git subtree will attempt to build its history from there.
+
If you used 'git subtree add', you should never need this option.

--rejoin::
	After splitting, merge the newly created synthetic history back into
	your main project.  That way, future splits can search only the part of
	history that has been added since the most recent '--rejoin'.
+
If your split commits end up merged into the upstream subproject, and
then you want to get the latest upstream version, this will allow git's
merge algorithm to more intelligently avoid conflicts (since it knows
these synthetic commits are already part of the upstream repository).
+
Unfortunately, using this option results in 'git log' showing an extra
copy of every new commit that was created (the original, and the
synthetic one).
+
If you do all your merges with '--squash', make sure you also use
'--squash' when you 'split --rejoin'.


EXAMPLE 1. 'add' command
------------------------
Let's assume that you have a local repository that you would like
to add an external vendor library to. In this case we will add the
git-subtree repository as a subdirectory of your already existing
git-extensions repository in ~/git-extensions/:

	$ git subtree add --prefix=git-subtree --squash \
		git://github.com/apenwarr/git-subtree.git master

'master' needs to be a valid remote ref and can be a different branch
name

You can omit the '--squash' flag, but doing so will increase the number
of commits that are included in your local repository.

We now have a ~/git-extensions/git-subtree directory containing code
from the master branch of git://github.com/apenwarr/git-subtree.git
in our git-extensions repository.

EXAMPLE 2. Extract a subtree using 'commit', 'merge' and 'pull'
---------------------------------------------------------------
Let's use the repository for the git source code as an example.
First, get your own copy of the git.git repository:

	$ git clone git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/git/git.git test-git
	$ cd test-git

gitweb (commit 1130ef3) was merged into git as of commit
0a8f4f0, after which it was no longer maintained separately.
But imagine it had been maintained separately, and we wanted to
extract git's changes to gitweb since that time, to share with
the upstream.  You could do this:

	$ git subtree split --prefix=gitweb --annotate='(split) ' \
        	0a8f4f0^.. --onto=1130ef3 --rejoin \
        	--branch gitweb-latest
        $ gitk gitweb-latest
        $ git push git@github.com:whatever/gitweb.git gitweb-latest:master

(We use '0a8f4f0^..' because that means "all the changes from
0a8f4f0 to the current version, including 0a8f4f0 itself.")

If gitweb had originally been merged using 'git subtree add' (or
a previous split had already been done with '--rejoin' specified)
then you can do all your splits without having to remember any
weird commit IDs:

	$ git subtree split --prefix=gitweb --annotate='(split) ' --rejoin \
		--branch gitweb-latest2

And you can merge changes back in from the upstream project just
as easily:

	$ git subtree pull --prefix=gitweb \
		git@github.com:whatever/gitweb.git master

Or, using '--squash', you can actually rewind to an earlier
version of gitweb:

	$ git subtree merge --prefix=gitweb --squash gitweb-latest~10

Then make some changes:

	$ date >gitweb/myfile
	$ git add gitweb/myfile
	$ git commit -m 'created myfile'

And fast forward again:

	$ git subtree merge --prefix=gitweb --squash gitweb-latest

And notice that your change is still intact:

	$ ls -l gitweb/myfile

And you can split it out and look at your changes versus
the standard gitweb:

	git log gitweb-latest..$(git subtree split --prefix=gitweb)

EXAMPLE 3. Extract a subtree using a branch
-------------------------------------------
Suppose you have a source directory with many files and
subdirectories, and you want to extract the lib directory to its own
git project. Here's a short way to do it:

First, make the new repository wherever you want:

	$ <go to the new location>
	$ git init --bare

Back in your original directory:

	$ git subtree split --prefix=lib --annotate="(split)" -b split

Then push the new branch onto the new empty repository:

	$ git push <new-repo> split:master


AUTHOR
------
Written by Avery Pennarun <apenwarr@gmail.com>


GIT
---
Part of the linkgit:git[1] suite