| A tutorial introduction to git | |
| ============================== | |
| This tutorial explains how to import a new project into git, make | |
| changes to it, and share changes with other developers. | |
| First, note that you can get documentation for a command such as "git | |
| diff" with: | |
| ------------------------------------------------ | |
| $ man git-diff | |
| ------------------------------------------------ | |
| Importing a new project | |
| ----------------------- | |
| Assume you have a tarball project.tar.gz with your initial work. You | |
| can place it under git revision control as follows. | |
| ------------------------------------------------ | |
| $ tar -xzf project.tar.gz | |
| $ cd project | |
| $ git init-db | |
| ------------------------------------------------ | |
| Git will reply | |
| ------------------------------------------------ | |
| defaulting to local storage area | |
| ------------------------------------------------ | |
| You've now initialized the working directory--you may notice a new | |
| directory created, named ".git". Tell git that you want it to track | |
| every file under the current directory with | |
| ------------------------------------------------ | |
| $ git add . | |
| ------------------------------------------------ | |
| Finally, | |
| ------------------------------------------------ | |
| $ git commit -a | |
| ------------------------------------------------ | |
| will prompt you for a commit message, then record the current state | |
| of all the files to the repository. | |
| Try modifying some files, then run | |
| ------------------------------------------------ | |
| $ git diff | |
| ------------------------------------------------ | |
| to review your changes. When you're done, | |
| ------------------------------------------------ | |
| $ git commit -a | |
| ------------------------------------------------ | |
| will again prompt your for a message describing the change, and then | |
| record the new versions of the modified files. | |
| A note on commit messages: Though not required, it's a good idea to | |
| begin the commit message with a single short (less than 50 character) | |
| line summarizing the change, followed by a blank line and then a more | |
| thorough description. Tools that turn commits into email, for | |
| example, use the first line on the Subject line and the rest of the | |
| commit in the body. | |
| To add a new file, first create the file, then | |
| ------------------------------------------------ | |
| $ git add path/to/new/file | |
| ------------------------------------------------ | |
| then commit as usual. No special command is required when removing a | |
| file; just remove it, then commit. | |
| At any point you can view the history of your changes using | |
| ------------------------------------------------ | |
| $ git whatchanged | |
| ------------------------------------------------ | |
| If you also want to see complete diffs at each step, use | |
| ------------------------------------------------ | |
| $ git whatchanged -p | |
| ------------------------------------------------ | |
| Managing branches | |
| ----------------- | |
| A single git repository can maintain multiple branches of | |
| development. To create a new branch named "experimental", use | |
| ------------------------------------------------ | |
| $ git branch experimental | |
| ------------------------------------------------ | |
| If you now run | |
| ------------------------------------------------ | |
| $ git branch | |
| ------------------------------------------------ | |
| you'll get a list of all existing branches: | |
| ------------------------------------------------ | |
| experimental | |
| * master | |
| ------------------------------------------------ | |
| The "experimental" branch is the one you just created, and the | |
| "master" branch is a default branch that was created for you | |
| automatically. The asterisk marks the branch you are currently on; | |
| type | |
| ------------------------------------------------ | |
| $ git checkout experimental | |
| ------------------------------------------------ | |
| to switch to the experimental branch. Now edit a file, commit the | |
| change, and switch back to the master branch: | |
| ------------------------------------------------ | |
| (edit file) | |
| $ git commit -a | |
| $ git checkout master | |
| ------------------------------------------------ | |
| Check that the change you made is no longer visible, since it was | |
| made on the experimental branch and you're back on the master branch. | |
| You can make a different change on the master branch: | |
| ------------------------------------------------ | |
| (edit file) | |
| $ git commit -a | |
| ------------------------------------------------ | |
| at this point the two branches have diverged, with different changes | |
| made in each. To merge the changes made in the two branches, run | |
| ------------------------------------------------ | |
| $ git pull . experimental | |
| ------------------------------------------------ | |
| If the changes don't conflict, you're done. If there are conflicts, | |
| markers will be left in the problematic files showing the conflict; | |
| ------------------------------------------------ | |
| $ git diff | |
| ------------------------------------------------ | |
| will show this. Once you've edited the files to resolve the | |
| conflicts, | |
| ------------------------------------------------ | |
| $ git commit -a | |
| ------------------------------------------------ | |
| will commit the result of the merge. Finally, | |
| ------------------------------------------------ | |
| $ gitk | |
| ------------------------------------------------ | |
| will show a nice graphical representation of the resulting history. | |
| If you develop on a branch crazy-idea, then regret it, you can always | |
| delete the branch with | |
| ------------------------------------- | |
| $ git branch -D crazy-idea | |
| ------------------------------------- | |
| Branches are cheap and easy, so this is a good way to try something | |
| out. | |
| Using git for collaboration | |
| --------------------------- | |
| Suppose that Alice has started a new project with a git repository in | |
| /home/alice/project, and that Bob, who has a home directory on the | |
| same machine, wants to contribute. | |
| Bob begins with: | |
| ------------------------------------------------ | |
| $ git clone /home/alice/project myrepo | |
| ------------------------------------------------ | |
| This creates a new directory "myrepo" containing a clone of Alice's | |
| repository. The clone is on an equal footing with the original | |
| project, posessing its own copy of the original project's history. | |
| Bob then makes some changes and commits them: | |
| ------------------------------------------------ | |
| (edit files) | |
| $ git commit -a | |
| (repeat as necessary) | |
| ------------------------------------------------ | |
| When he's ready, he tells Alice to pull changes from the repository | |
| at /home/bob/myrepo. She does this with: | |
| ------------------------------------------------ | |
| $ cd /home/alice/project | |
| $ git pull /home/bob/myrepo | |
| ------------------------------------------------ | |
| This actually pulls changes from the branch in Bob's repository named | |
| "master". Alice could request a different branch by adding the name | |
| of the branch to the end of the git pull command line. | |
| This merges Bob's changes into her repository; "git whatchanged" will | |
| now show the new commits. If Alice has made her own changes in the | |
| meantime, then Bob's changes will be merged in, and she will need to | |
| manually fix any conflicts. | |
| A more cautious Alice might wish to examine Bob's changes before | |
| pulling them. She can do this by creating a temporary branch just | |
| for the purpose of studying Bob's changes: | |
| ------------------------------------- | |
| $ git fetch /home/bob/myrepo master:bob-incoming | |
| ------------------------------------- | |
| which fetches the changes from Bob's master branch into a new branch | |
| named bob-incoming. (Unlike git pull, git fetch just fetches a copy | |
| of Bob's line of development without doing any merging). Then | |
| ------------------------------------- | |
| $ git whatchanged -p master..bob-incoming | |
| ------------------------------------- | |
| shows a list of all the changes that Bob made since he branched from | |
| Alice's master branch. | |
| After examing those changes, and possibly fixing things, Alice can | |
| pull the changes into her master branch: | |
| ------------------------------------- | |
| $ git checkout master | |
| $ git pull . bob-incoming | |
| ------------------------------------- | |
| The last command is a pull from the "bob-incoming" branch in Alice's | |
| own repository. | |
| Later, Bob can update his repo with Alice's latest changes using | |
| ------------------------------------- | |
| $ git pull | |
| ------------------------------------- | |
| Note that he doesn't need to give the path to Alice's repository; | |
| when Bob cloned Alice's repository, git stored the location of her | |
| repository in the file .git/remotes/origin, and that location is used | |
| as the default for pulls. | |
| Bob may also notice a branch in his repository that he didn't create: | |
| ------------------------------------- | |
| $ git branch | |
| * master | |
| origin | |
| ------------------------------------- | |
| The "origin" branch, which was created automatically by "git clone", | |
| is a pristine copy of Alice's master branch; Bob should never commit | |
| to it. | |
| If Bob later decides to work from a different host, he can still | |
| perform clones and pulls using the ssh protocol: | |
| ------------------------------------- | |
| $ git clone alice.org:/home/alice/project myrepo | |
| ------------------------------------- | |
| Alternatively, git has a native protocol, or can use rsync or http; | |
| see gitlink:git-pull[1] for details. | |
| Git can also be used in a CVS-like mode, with a central repository | |
| that various users push changes to; see gitlink:git-push[1] and | |
| link:cvs-migration.html[git for CVS users]. | |
| Keeping track of history | |
| ------------------------ | |
| Git history is represented as a series of interrelated commits. The | |
| most recent commit in the currently checked-out branch can always be | |
| referred to as HEAD, and the "parent" of any commit can always be | |
| referred to by appending a caret, "^", to the end of the name of the | |
| commit. So, for example, | |
| ------------------------------------- | |
| git diff HEAD^ HEAD | |
| ------------------------------------- | |
| shows the difference between the most-recently checked-in state of | |
| the tree and the previous state, and | |
| ------------------------------------- | |
| git diff HEAD^^ HEAD^ | |
| ------------------------------------- | |
| shows the difference between that previous state and the state two | |
| commits ago. Also, HEAD~5 can be used as a shorthand for HEAD^^^^^, | |
| and more generally HEAD~n can refer to the nth previous commit. | |
| Commits representing merges have more than one parent, and you can | |
| specify which parent to follow in that case; see | |
| gitlink:git-rev-parse[1]. | |
| The name of a branch can also be used to refer to the most recent | |
| commit on that branch; so you can also say things like | |
| ------------------------------------- | |
| git diff HEAD experimental | |
| ------------------------------------- | |
| to see the difference between the most-recently committed tree in | |
| the current branch and the most-recently committed tree in the | |
| experimental branch. | |
| But you may find it more useful to see the list of commits made in | |
| the experimental branch but not in the current branch, and | |
| ------------------------------------- | |
| git whatchanged HEAD..experimental | |
| ------------------------------------- | |
| will do that, just as | |
| ------------------------------------- | |
| git whatchanged experimental..HEAD | |
| ------------------------------------- | |
| will show the list of commits made on the HEAD but not included in | |
| experimental. | |
| You can also give commits convenient names of your own: after running | |
| ------------------------------------- | |
| $ git-tag v2.5 HEAD^^ | |
| ------------------------------------- | |
| you can refer to HEAD^^ by the name "v2.5". If you intend to share | |
| this name with other people (for example, to identify a release | |
| version), you should create a "tag" object, and perhaps sign it; see | |
| gitlink:git-tag[1] for details. | |
| You can revisit the old state of a tree, and make further | |
| modifications if you wish, using git branch: the command | |
| ------------------------------------- | |
| $ git branch stable-release v2.5 | |
| ------------------------------------- | |
| will create a new branch named "stable-release" starting from the | |
| commit which you tagged with the name v2.5. | |
| You can reset the state of any branch to an earlier commit at any | |
| time with | |
| ------------------------------------- | |
| $ git reset --hard v2.5 | |
| ------------------------------------- | |
| This will remove all later commits from this branch and reset the | |
| working tree to the state it had when the given commit was made. If | |
| this branch is the only branch containing the later commits, those | |
| later changes will be lost. Don't use "git reset" on a | |
| publicly-visible branch that other developers pull from, as git will | |
| be confused by history that disappears in this way. | |
| Next Steps | |
| ---------- | |
| Some good commands to explore next: | |
| * gitlink:git-diff[1]: This flexible command does much more than | |
| we've seen in the few examples above. | |
| * gitlink:git-format-patch[1], gitlink:git-am[1]: These convert | |
| series of git commits into emailed patches, and vice versa, | |
| useful for projects such as the linux kernel which rely heavily | |
| on emailed patches. | |
| * gitlink:git-bisect[1]: When there is a regression in your | |
| project, one way to track down the bug is by searching through | |
| the history to find the exact commit that's to blame. Git bisect | |
| can help you perform a binary search for that commit. It is | |
| smart enough to perform a close-to-optimal search even in the | |
| case of complex non-linear history with lots of merged branches. | |
| Other good starting points include link:everyday.html[Everday GIT | |
| with 20 Commands Or So] and link:cvs-migration.html[git for CVS | |
| users]. Also, link:core-tutorial.html[A short git tutorial] gives an | |
| introduction to lower-level git commands for advanced users and | |
| developers. |