| Simple-IPC API | |
| ============== | |
| The Simple-IPC API is a collection of `ipc_` prefixed library routines | |
| and a basic communication protocol that allows an IPC-client process to | |
| send an application-specific IPC-request message to an IPC-server | |
| process and receive an application-specific IPC-response message. | |
| Communication occurs over a named pipe on Windows and a Unix domain | |
| socket on other platforms. IPC-clients and IPC-servers rendezvous at | |
| a previously agreed-to application-specific pathname (which is outside | |
| the scope of this design) that is local to the computer system. | |
| The IPC-server routines within the server application process create a | |
| thread pool to listen for connections and receive request messages | |
| from multiple concurrent IPC-clients. When received, these messages | |
| are dispatched up to the server application callbacks for handling. | |
| IPC-server routines then incrementally relay responses back to the | |
| IPC-client. | |
| The IPC-client routines within a client application process connect | |
| to the IPC-server and send a request message and wait for a response. | |
| When received, the response is returned back to the caller. | |
| For example, the `fsmonitor--daemon` feature will be built as a server | |
| application on top of the IPC-server library routines. It will have | |
| threads watching for file system events and a thread pool waiting for | |
| client connections. Clients, such as `git status`, will request a list | |
| of file system events since a point in time and the server will | |
| respond with a list of changed files and directories. The formats of | |
| the request and response are application-specific; the IPC-client and | |
| IPC-server routines treat them as opaque byte streams. | |
| Comparison with sub-process model | |
| --------------------------------- | |
| The Simple-IPC mechanism differs from the existing `sub-process.c` | |
| model (Documentation/technical/long-running-process-protocol.adoc) and | |
| used by applications like Git-LFS. In the LFS-style sub-process model, | |
| the helper is started by the foreground process, communication happens | |
| via a pair of file descriptors bound to the stdin/stdout of the | |
| sub-process, the sub-process only serves the current foreground | |
| process, and the sub-process exits when the foreground process | |
| terminates. | |
| In the Simple-IPC model the server is a very long-running service. It | |
| can service many clients at the same time and has a private socket or | |
| named pipe connection to each active client. It might be started | |
| (on-demand) by the current client process or it might have been | |
| started by a previous client or by the OS at boot time. The server | |
| process is not associated with a terminal and it persists after | |
| clients terminate. Clients do not have access to the stdin/stdout of | |
| the server process and therefore must communicate over sockets or | |
| named pipes. | |
| Server startup and shutdown | |
| --------------------------- | |
| How an application server based upon IPC-server is started is also | |
| outside the scope of the Simple-IPC design and is a property of the | |
| application using it. For example, the server might be started or | |
| restarted during routine maintenance operations, or it might be | |
| started as a system service during the system boot-up sequence, or it | |
| might be started on-demand by a foreground Git command when needed. | |
| Similarly, server shutdown is a property of the application using | |
| the simple-ipc routines. For example, the server might decide to | |
| shutdown when idle or only upon explicit request. | |
| Simple-IPC protocol | |
| ------------------- | |
| The Simple-IPC protocol consists of a single request message from the | |
| client and an optional response message from the server. Both the | |
| client and server messages are unlimited in length and are terminated | |
| with a flush packet. | |
| The pkt-line routines (linkgit:gitprotocol-common[5]) | |
| are used to simplify buffer management during message generation, | |
| transmission, and reception. A flush packet is used to mark the end | |
| of the message. This allows the sender to incrementally generate and | |
| transmit the message. It allows the receiver to incrementally receive | |
| the message in chunks and to know when they have received the entire | |
| message. | |
| The actual byte format of the client request and server response | |
| messages are application specific. The IPC layer transmits and | |
| receives them as opaque byte buffers without any concern for the | |
| content within. It is the job of the calling application layer to | |
| understand the contents of the request and response messages. | |
| Summary | |
| ------- | |
| Conceptually, the Simple-IPC protocol is similar to an HTTP REST | |
| request. Clients connect, make an application-specific and | |
| stateless request, receive an application-specific | |
| response, and disconnect. It is a one round trip facility for | |
| querying the server. The Simple-IPC routines hide the socket, | |
| named pipe, and thread pool details and allow the application | |
| layer to focus on the task at hand. |