bloom: silence CHECK_ASSERTION_SIDE_EFFECTS false positive Using gcc 15, compiling with CHECK_ASSERTION_SIDE_EFFECTS=1 causes a complaint about this line in bloom.c having a side effect: assert(version == 1 || version == 2); I think this is pretty clearly a false positive, as those comparisons should not have side effects. The side-effect checker uses a magic definition of assert() that relies on the compiler's optimizer to drop a reference to an otherwise unused variable. And for whatever reason, gcc chooses not to do so here under -O2 (side note: if you have -O0 in your CFLAGS, that naturally creates many more false positives!). This code has been around for a while, but nobody seems to have noticed because we use an older version of the compiler in our static-analysis ci job, and it does not complain. Presumably very few people run this check locally on their more modern compilers. Let's silence the false positive to avoid confusion for anyone running locally, and to make it possible to upgrade the image we use for our static-analysis job. We could just switch to our custom ASSERT() here, but I think we can improve the code by integrating the assertion into the if/else cascade. That avoids repeating the logic about which versions are acceptable. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Git is a fast, scalable, distributed revision control system with an unusually rich command set that provides both high-level operations and full access to internals.
Git is an Open Source project covered by the GNU General Public License version 2 (some parts of it are under different licenses, compatible with the GPLv2). It was originally written by Linus Torvalds with help of a group of hackers around the net.
Please read the file INSTALL for installation instructions.
Many Git online resources are accessible from https://git-scm.com/ including full documentation and Git related tools.
See Documentation/gittutorial.adoc to get started, then see Documentation/giteveryday.adoc for a useful minimum set of commands, and Documentation/git-<commandname>.adoc for documentation of each command. If git has been correctly installed, then the tutorial can also be read with man gittutorial or git help tutorial, and the documentation of each command with man git-<commandname> or git help <commandname>.
CVS users may also want to read Documentation/gitcvs-migration.adoc (man gitcvs-migration or git help cvs-migration if git is installed).
The user discussion and development of Git take place on the Git mailing list -- everyone is welcome to post bug reports, feature requests, comments and patches to git@vger.kernel.org (read Documentation/SubmittingPatches for instructions on patch submission and Documentation/CodingGuidelines).
Those wishing to help with error message, usage and informational message string translations (localization l10) should see po/README.md (a po file is a Portable Object file that holds the translations).
To subscribe to the list, send an email to git+subscribe@vger.kernel.org (see https://subspace.kernel.org/subscribing.html for details). The mailing list archives are available at https://lore.kernel.org/git/, https://marc.info/?l=git and other archival sites.
Issues which are security relevant should be disclosed privately to the Git Security mailing list git-security@googlegroups.com.
The maintainer frequently sends the “What's cooking” reports that list the current status of various development topics to the mailing list. The discussion following them give a good reference for project status, development direction and remaining tasks.
The name “git” was given by Linus Torvalds when he wrote the very first version. He described the tool as “the stupid content tracker” and the name as (depending on your mood):